Promote GA say cross-party MPs after US fact-finding tour

Much more can be done to promote General Aviation and develop high-tech jobs and skills were the conclusions of a party of MPs who went to the US recently on a fact-finding mission.

The trip, organised by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on General Aviation (APPG GA), also visited the EAA AirVenture event to learn more about the US’s thriving grassroots sector and how it compares to the UK.

The MPs met with two of their US counterparts from the Congressional General Aviation Caucus, Rep. Sam Graves and Rep. Marc Veasey. They then met with organisations including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the National Air Transportation Association (NATA) and Helicopter Association International (HAI).

Topics for discussion included:

  • Regulation of General Aviation in the United States
  • Current legislative environment in both the US and the UK
  • Economic benefits of General Aviation to local and national economies
  • Continued mutual recognition of standards post-Brexit.

Meetings were also held with the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) and the General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA), who organised a tech tour of EAA AirVenture to companies such as Hartzell Propeller, Piper, Textron and BendixKing.

APPG GA US visit
The cross-party group of MPs at Oshkosh, and top, slightly more formal in Washington.

Following the airshow, the parliamentarians headed to Frederick, Maryland to meet with the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA), the world’s largest aviation association, to discuss key ways of engaging more young people in aviation and General Aviation in particular.

Sheryll Murray MP, who was part of the delegation and is a member of the all-party group, said, “Our group of parliamentarians have had a fascinating and incredibly worthwhile series of meetings in the United States, to learn about the overall picture of General Aviation there and identify measures that the UK Government can adopt to grow and enhance this grassroots sector here.

“It’s clear from the high-level meetings we held with the Federal Aviation Administration, the National Business Aviation Association and the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association amongst others, that there is much more the Department for Transport and the Civil Aviation Authority can be doing to promote the importance of General Aviation, and the high-tech jobs and skills it brings.

“Colleagues from the all-party group will be coming forward with legislative proposals to get more young people, and particularly young women, involved in grassroots aviation jobs – otherwise the UK’s £60bn+ wider aviation sector will struggle to survive.”

All-Party Parliamentary Group on General Aviation


  1. It’s refreshing to see that at last G.A, is receiving some sort of focus and attention from Government. I’m always depressed when I see what fantastic new technology orientated machines that are European and USA colleagues are allowed to fly while we in Britain take for ever to certificate something and our regulations lag so far behind the technology. We used to lead the world aviation , now sadly most GA planes come from other lands.
    If we want younger people to fly , let’s make the planes exciting , let’s try and get the cost down and let’s make the rules and regulations simple and easy to understand. I want the UK to lead the world again in aviation so stop the endless committees and take some decisions now rather than later.

  2. The biggest problem with aviation in this country is the CAA (campaign against aviation) They are a law unto themselves. They are now apparently very understaffed hence all decisions are taking ages. Even routine things like licences are taking too long

  3. We need more airfields. Too many people have to travel for hours by car to reach a General Aviation airfield. Trying to start a new airfield with the benefit of planning permission is/was impossible.
    Perhaps the changes to the NPPF will help.
    Airfields and other infrastructure projects should be determined by a National Planning Authority. Most planning authorities have no idea when it comes to airfields other than to refuse applications for ill founded reasons.
    Difficult to involve young people if they never see a light aircraft.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *